Lesson 7 of 8 · Critical Illness Insurance

Claim Scenarios — Illustrative Approvals, Rejections & Disputes

How a critical illness claim is decided against the policy wording, the usual reasons a claim is paid or declined, what the 60-month moratorium does and does not do, and the routes open to a policyholder who disagrees.

Fact-checked 8 October 20263 practice questions in the game

Facts set against wording

A critical illness claim is decided by setting the facts against the policy wording. It is payable when the illness is one the policy lists, the diagnosis meets the policy's definition, the waiting and survival periods are satisfied and no exclusion applies.

Each of these is a question with a documentary answer. The medical records and test reports show what was diagnosed and when; the policy shows what is listed, how it is defined and which periods apply.

Why claims are declined

Common reasons for declining a claim include: the condition is not listed, the definition is not met, the diagnosis falls in the waiting period, the insured does not survive the survival period, an exclusion applies, the policy is not in force, or material facts were not disclosed at proposal.

The first reason is easy to miss. A policy pays only for the conditions and procedures it lists and defines. Angioplasty and bypass surgery are different procedures, so a policy that lists coronary artery bypass surgery but not angioplasty does not pay for an angioplasty. Some policies list angioplasty as a separate benefit; the wording decides.

Non-disclosure and the moratorium

A proposer has to disclose material facts, such as known medical conditions, when applying. If they were not disclosed, the insurer may contest a claim on that ground, but not for ever. After 60 continuous months of cover, called the moratorium period, a health insurance policy or claim cannot be contested for non-disclosure or misrepresentation unless fraud is established. The period was 96 months before IRDAI's 2024 change.

The moratorium has limits. It bars challenges for non-disclosure or misrepresentation only. Exclusions written into the policy as permanent still apply, and a condition that is not listed, or a diagnosis that does not meet the definition, is no more payable after 60 months than before.

If the policyholder disagrees

A complaint goes first to the insurer, which must resolve it within 14 days; it can also be registered on Bima Bharosa, IRDAI's grievance portal. If the complaint is rejected, is not answered for one month or is answered unsatisfactorily, the policyholder may approach the Insurance Ombudsman within one year. The Ombudsman charges no fee and can make an award of up to ₹50 lakh, a cap raised from ₹30 lakh with effect from 10 November 2023.

An award binds the insurer once the complainant accepts it, and the insurer must comply within 30 days. A complainant who is not satisfied remains free to go to a consumer commission or a court. Consumer commissions are open as a separate route under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019: the commission that hears a case depends on the premium paid, not the claim amount, and a complaint must be filed within two years of the cause of action. A matter pending before a court, a consumer commission or an arbitrator cannot be before the Ombudsman at the same time.

Rules at a glance

Moratorium60 continuous months; afterwards no contest for non-disclosure or misrepresentation unless fraud is establishedIRDAI Master Circular on Health Insurance Business, 29 May 2024; earlier 96 months
Insurer's resolution of a complaintWithin 14 daysIRDAI Master Circular on Protection of Policyholders' Interests, 5 September 2024
Approaching the OmbudsmanAfter rejection, no reply for one month or an unsatisfactory reply; within one yearInsurance Ombudsman Rules, 2017
Maximum award₹50 lakhInsurance Ombudsman Rules, 2017, as amended from 10 November 2023; earlier ₹30 lakh
Consumer commissions, by premium paidDistrict up to ₹50 lakh; State above ₹50 lakh up to ₹2 crore; National above ₹2 croreConsumer Protection Act, 2019 and the 2021 jurisdiction rules
Illustration

Three claims, three outcomes

Illustrative scenarios. First: Meera is diagnosed with a listed illness after the waiting period, the diagnosis meets the definition, she is alive at the end of the survival period and no exclusion applies. The claim is payable.

Second: Suresh's policy lists coronary artery bypass surgery but not angioplasty. He undergoes angioplasty and claims. On the wording the claim is not payable, because angioplasty is not a listed condition.

Third: an insurer rejects Kavita's ₹30 lakh claim and then rejects her written complaint. She may approach the Insurance Ombudsman within one year, at no fee. ₹30 lakh is not more than ₹50 lakh, so the claim is within the award limit. If she is not satisfied with the outcome, she can still go to a consumer commission or a court.

Key points

  • A claim is payable when the illness is listed, the definition is met, the waiting and survival periods are satisfied and no exclusion applies.
  • A condition or procedure that the policy does not list is not payable, however similar it is to one that is listed.
  • After 60 continuous months of cover, a health policy claim cannot be contested for non-disclosure unless fraud is established.
  • The moratorium does not override permanent exclusions or the policy's definitions.
  • A complaint goes first to the insurer, then to the Insurance Ombudsman within one year, free of charge, for an award of up to ₹50 lakh.

Common misunderstandings

  • The moratorium does not make every claim payable: it bars challenges for non-disclosure or misrepresentation, while unlisted conditions and permanent exclusions stay outside the cover.
  • An Ombudsman's award does not close other routes for the complainant: it binds the insurer, while the complainant may still go to a consumer commission or court.
  • The 60-month moratorium is not section 45 of the Insurance Act, 1938: that section, with its three-year limit, is a separate rule for life insurance policies.

Questions people ask

A claim was declined because the diagnosis came in the waiting period. Can it be claimed again once the waiting period is over?

No. An illness first diagnosed in the waiting period is not payable, and the claim does not revive when the period ends.

After 60 months, can an insurer still decline a claim?

Yes, on grounds other than non-disclosure or misrepresentation, for example that the condition is not listed or the definition is not met, and where fraud is established.

What this lesson relies on

  • IRDAI Master Circular on Health Insurance Business (29 May 2024) — moratorium
  • IRDAI Master Circular on Protection of Policyholders' Interests (5 September 2024)
  • Insurance Ombudsman Rules, 2017 (as amended with effect from 10 November 2023)
  • Consumer Protection Act, 2019 and the Consumer Protection (Jurisdiction of the District Commission, the State Commission and the National Commission) Rules, 2021

This lesson was reviewed independently against these sources on 8 October 2026. Rules change: check the current regulation, scheme document or policy wording before relying on any figure. This is education, not advice.

Free learning from the Trustner Group. Trustner Academy is an education initiative of the Trustner Group, whose companies work across insurance broking and investment services, with offices in Bangalore, Guwahati, Kolkata, Hyderabad and Mumbai. Everything here is for learning only — it is not advice, a recommendation or an offer of any product. Scenarios are illustrative. Rules and figures change; check the current regulation, scheme document or policy wording before acting on anything.